Part 1: A Summary of the Traits of the Filthy Haddaadiyyah
In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy
They hate the contemporary scholars of the Salafi methodology. They belittle them, declare them ignorant and misguided and lie against them, especially the scholars of Madeenah. Then they proceed towards attacking Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah, Imaam Ibnul Qayyim and Imaam Ibn Abil Izz Al-Hanafi the explainer of Aqeedah At-Tahaawiyyah. They speak about their affair in order to nullify their status and reject their statements
They declared everyone who falls into innovation an innovator (i.e. with applying the correct principles before declaring a person an innovator).
In their view Imaam Ibn Hajr is more severe (in misguidance) and more dangerous than sayyid qutb.
They declare a person an innovator when he fails to declare a person who has fallen into innovation an innovator. (see Footnote 1 for a clarification of this affair); they show him enmity and wage war against him. It is not enough for them (haddaadees) for you to say: Such a person has some affairs of the Ashaa-ira or that he is an ash-ariy; rather you have to say: He is an innovator; and if you do not do so they wage war against you, boycott and declare you an innovator
They make it impermissible to ask for Allaah’s mercy upon Ahlul Bidah without exception. They do not differentiate between a raafidiy, a qadariy, a jahmiy and a scholar who fell into innovation. They declare you an innovator if you ask for Allaah’s mercy upon Imaam Abu Haneefah, Imaam Shawkaanee, Imaam Ibn Jawzee, Imaam Ibn Hajr and Imaam Nawawi– may Allaah have mercy upon them
Paraphrased and abridge from the words of Al-Allaamah Rabee bin Haadee Al-Madkhalee: Source: http://www.ajurry.com/vb/showthread.php?t=24453
Clarification Regarding the Principle: Whoever does not declare a Mubtadi as a Mubtadi, then he is a Mubtadi (himself)
Question: The principle: ‘whoever does not declare an innovator as an innovation, he (himself) is an innovator; some people say that this principle is strange (or alien to Salafiyyah);
The Shaikh answered: It is not correct to apply this principle unrestrictedly because it maybe that this (person) does not know (that) person for the bidah he commits, so he does not declare him an innovator due to Wara (apprehensive fear(1); so why should you declare him an innovator? ( i.e this person who refrains from making tabdee of a mubtadi because he neither knows his innovation or refrains from making Tabdee of him out of wara); but if he knows the innovator (i.e. knows that he is upon bidah), loves him and allies with him, then he is a mubtadi. This is the differentiation in this affair – he knows that this person is an innovator but he aids him and wages war against Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah, then this person is a mubtadi without a doubt. As for a person who does not know that such and such person is a mubtadi, he is not to be declared an innovator- this principle is not applied to him. (As for) you (i.e. the scholar), the one that studied his affair and you know that he allies with a mubtadi, puts him in a favourable position, wages war against Ahlus Sunnah for the sake of this mubtadi and for the sake of this falsehood, this person is a mubtadi, astray. As for the person who does not know that indeed such and such person is a mubtadi, then advise him and clarify for him (i.e. with clear unambiguous proofs until he understands) that such person is a mubtadi. So unless he ceases (i.e. from defending this mubtadi after understanding that to be the case) then put him with his companion – the mubtadi. [See Awnul Baari 2/891..slightly paraphrased]